[126], In September and October 2015, nail salon owners and workers protested at The New York Times offices several times, in response to the story and the ensuing New York State crackdown. Science officially pulled the paper, by Michael LaCour of the University of California, Los Angeles, and . (Bound) 22416 - INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT OF WEN HO LEE, "Statement by Judge in Los Alamos Case, With Apology for Abuse of Power", "Former Army Scientist Sues New York Times, Columnist", "Steven J. Hatfill v. The New York Times Company, and Nicholas Kristof, 416 F.3d 320", "Supreme Court won't hear Hatfill's libel suit", "Correcting the Record: Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception", "Jayson Blair: A Case Study of What Went Wrong at The New York Times", "THREATS AND RESPONSES: THE IRAQIS; U.S. SAYS HUSSEIN INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS", "Transcript of Secretary of State Colin Powell's Remarks to the United Nations Security Council", "New York Times admits failures in run-up to war", "The New York Times' role in promoting war on Iraq", "The Miller Mess: Lingering Issues Among the Answers", "NY Times criticized for ad attacking top US general", "Manufacturing Consent: A Propaganda Model: excerpted from the book", "Excerpts from Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky interviewed by various interviewers", "For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk - New York Times", "Bob Bennett Reacts to New York Times Story on John McCain", "McCain disputes report of lobbyist relationship", "White House Accuses NYT of Anti-GOP Bias", "Did The New York Times Smear John McCain? "[110], In 2014, PBS Frontline interviewed Risen and Lichtblau, who said that the newspaper's plan was initially to not publish the story at all, and that "The editors were furious at me" and "thought I was being insubordinate." "[46] The reporting on the aluminum tubes, and reliance on anti-Saddam campaigner Ahmed Chalabi as a source, soon became a leading critique of the Times' coverage leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Washington Post has published an astonishing retraction two months after a bombshell story about a phone call between Donald Trump and an elections investigator in Georgia. Here are our picks for the most significant pandemic-related retractions: 1 The most spectacular flameouts involved a pair of articles that appeared in two of the world's most prestigious medical journals. Click on the clue you need to get the answer, which is given below. [181], Within a day the NYT issued a response, saying Our journalism strives to explore, interrogate and reflect the experiences, ideas and debates in society to help readers understand them. A Masked, Armed Man. Los Angeles . Some claim that Sulzberger feared the Times would be "viewed as 'a special pleader for the Jews'"[11][13]at a time when anti-Semitism was relatively common in the United Statesif the Holocaust was given more prominent coverage. Like so many fake news stories about Donald Trump and his supporters, millions of Americans believe the Sicknick story as truth; even a correction won't change their minds. [68] The diverse sentiments by the readers were summarized in a separate article by Clark Hoyt, the Times public editor, who concluded: "I think it is wrong to report the suppositions or concerns of anonymous aides about whether the boss is getting into the wrong bed. Executive Editor Dean Baquet defended the cuts, saying that the Times needed to free up funds to hire more reporters by eliminating editing roles. On several occasions, we also mischaracterized party details, presumably to the chagrin of those present starting with a report from the Playboy Club. It is not nearly twice as much as the salaries of his counterparts. The New York Times (sometimes abbreviated to NYT) is an American daily newspaper, founded and continuously published in New York City since September 18, 1851, by The New York Times Company.. [100][101][102] The claim was criticized on the grounds that discussion of "influential rabbis" echoed antisemitic tropes, with critics asking which rabbis were known to have influence on Ocasio-Cortez; that Edmondson had attributed motives to Ocasio-Cortez without any factual basis; and that one could support the Iron Dome, a defensive installment that protects civilians, if one had been influenced by lobbyists or rabbis. [91] The hiring sparked a strongly negative reaction in conservative media, which highlighted derogatory tweets about white people that Jeong had posted mostly in 2013 and 2014. It was Meghan, Duchess of Sussex not Prince Harry who said, Were still trying to figure that out.. However, the newspaper did not publish reporting on the secret program (obtained by James Risen and Eric Lichtblau) until late December 2005, after more than a year. After years of proceedings,[35] the case was dismissed in 2007, and the dismissal was upheld on appeal. [77], An earlier contentious wording was on September 5, 2005, in an article on Hurricane Katrina where she wrote "Fox's Geraldo Rivera did his rivals one better: yesterday, he nudged an Air Force rescue worker out of the way so his camera crew could tape him as he helped lift an older woman in a wheelchair to safety." After the New York Post ran a story suggesting that the Times had a political bias in advertising rates, a spokeswoman for the paper said that it did not "distinguish the advertising rates based on the political content of the ad" and that "The advertising folks did not see the content of the ad before the rate was quoted. is thelma houston related to whitney houston; usair flight 427 victims . Editors currently not only edit the content of the stories but also, in many cases, provide the final read before publication. But on one occasion, we forgot to say either one, and painted a rather stingy picture of wildfire recovery efforts: Because of an editing error, an earlier version of a capsule summary with this article misstated the size of a fund proposed by Gov. Searches Home of Researcher Fired From Los Alamos", "Lawyer Issues Denial for Los Alamos Scientist Suspected of Spying for Beijing", "Security Issues May Delay Los Alamos Case, U.S. Says", "Los Alamos Punishes 3 for Role in Spy Inquiry", "Deal in Wen Ho Lee case may be imminent", 146 Cong. These are 10 of the biggest whoppers published by the NYT. [133], Responding to complaints alleging that the paper's news coverage favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders during the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries, The Times public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote that "The Times has not ignored Mr. Sanders's campaign, but it hasn't always taken it very seriously. "[72] Unusually, however, The Times agreed to publish a statement from Iseman's lawyers on the Times website.[72]. "I'm Sydney, and I'm in love with you. [54][55] A subsequent full-page ad bought by Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani to rebut MoveOn.org's original ad was purchased at the same standby rate. [52], On September 10, 2007, the Times ran a full-page advertisement for MoveOn.org questioning the integrity of General David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, entitled "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?" History. No other reporter whose testimony had been sought in the case had received such a direct and particularized release. In 2004, Hatfill sued The New York Times and Kristof for libel, claiming defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Jonathan Landman, Blair's editor, said he felt that Blair's being Black played a large part in Blair being promoted in 2001 to a full-time staffer. While Mr. Chernow attributed the remark to Mark Twain, there is no evidence that Twain ever said, Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason.. Still, on balance, I think the obituary makes clear that he was a man of strong faith and convictions, who stood by them even in the face of detractors, while finding ways to move the church forward."[143]. New York Times Issues Retraction In Bombshell Collusion Story The New York Times caused a firestorm over its reporting that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort attempted to pass internal Trump campaign data to a Russia oligarch with close ties to Vladimir Putin during the 2016 presidential race. New York Times Issues Retraction In Bombshell Collusion Story The New York Times caused a firestorm over its reporting that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort attempted to pass internal Trump campaign data to a Russia oligarch with close ties to Vladimir Putin during the 2016 presidential race. The article has been criticized as "tone-deaf"[164] and "journalistically irresponsible"[165] for pairing the sex abuse scandal with the shooting, with many calling for May to be reprimanded. No SSCI staff have commented, either." At that time it was United Press, not United Press International. Tom Rosenstiel, the director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, suggested that the article does not make clear the nature of McCain's alleged "inappropriate" behavior: "The phrasing is just too vague. But I also acknowledge that many of those who found the obituary wanting feel we did not provide a more rounded view of Mr. Monson perhaps his more human side. An earlier version of this article misattributed a quotation. [182][183][184], That same day, an internal memo was sent by the editors, saying Our coverage of transgender issues, including the specific pieces singled out for attack, is important, deeply reported, and sensitively written. As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. The regulations were meant to prevent dollar transfers to corrupt actors. [143] The Obituaries Editor William McDonald responded "I think the obituary was a faithful accounting of the more prominent issues that Mr. Monson encountered and dealt with publicly during his tenure. "The news about Russia is an example of what people wanted to see, not what happened," Lippmann and Merz wrote. Corrections that appeared in print on Saturday, March 4, 2023. Corrections that appeared in print on Friday, March 3, 2023. Corrections that appeared in print on Thursday, March 2, 2023. Corrections that appeared in print on Wednesday, March 1, 2023. It was last updated on March 3 2023, and it has a total of 68 clues. The New York Times, Washington Post and NBC News all issued retractions Saturday for their coverage of Rudy Giuliani following a raid of his Manhattan apartment by the FBI. A Masked, Armed Man. A surge in illegal crossings from the United States has led to calls to shut down a rural road on the Canadian border. 65% of Democrats said The Wall Street Journal is credible. But they have ended up harming ordinary Iraqis who need U.S. currency for legitimate purposes. [117][118] In response to the piece, M.I.A. [66] The Boston Globe, owned by the Times, declined to publish the story, choosing instead to run a version of the same story written by the competing Washington Post staff. Quotes Were Out of Context, NY Times Editor's Note Says Paper's Website Now Concedes That Two Quotes in Controversial Feature Were Rearranged", "Understanding M.I.A. Posted on June 18, 2015 Author News Comment(0) Spread the love. published on November 14, 2022", "The NYT's Big Piece on Puberty Blockers Mucked Up the Most Important Point About Them", "Nearly 200 New York Times Contributors Are Denouncing the Paper's Anti-Trans Coverage", "Nearly 1,000 contributors protest New York Times' coverage of trans people", "NYT contributors blast paper's coverage of transgender people", "N.Y. Times contributors and LGBTQ advocates send open letters criticizing paper's trans coverage", "Gabrielle Union, Tommy Dorfman, More Accuse NYT of 'Harmful' Coverage of Trans People", "These New York Times Contributors Say The Paper's Coverage Of Gender Issues Is Hurting Trans People", "Celebs rip into New York Times for 'irresponsible' transgender coverage: Demand end to 'both sides' focus", "Celebrities and Journalists Unite to Blast the New York Times' Trans Coverage", "How The Times Gave 'Gay' Its Own Voice (Again)", "NEARLY 200 NEW YORK TIMES CONTRIBUTORS ARE DENOUNCING THE PAPER'S ANTI-TRANS COVERAGE", "The NYT Knew What It Was Doing With Its 'Defense of J.K. Rowling', "How the New York Times was engulfed by a trans culture war", "NYT editors: Paper 'will not tolerate' its journalists protesting coverage of transgender people", Free Speech for Us: The Gray Lady's inconsistent defense of the First Amendment, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_controversies_involving_The_New_York_Times&oldid=1141873551, Articles that may be too long from May 2020, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Articles with unsourced statements from May 2009, Articles with unsourced statements from April 2021, Articles needing more detailed references, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, The New York Times Syndicate & News Service, This page was last edited on 27 February 2023, at 08:12.